Criterion 6 - Governance, Leadership and Management

Criterion 6 - Governance, Leadership and Management
6.1	Institutional Vision and Leadership
	6.1.1 The governance of the institution is reflective of an effective leadership in tune with the vision and mission of the institution Governing Council
	6.1.2.The effective leadership is reflected in various institutional practices such as Decentralization and Participative Management
6.2	Strategy Development and Deployment
	6.2.1 The institutional Strategic / Perspective plan is effectively deployed
	6.2.2 The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup appointment and service rules, procedures, etc.
	6.2.3 Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation 1. Administration 2. Finance and Accounts 3. Student Admission and Support 4. Examination
6.3	Faculty Empowerment Strategies
	6.3.1 The institution has effective welfare measures for teaching and non- teaching staff and avenues for career development progression
	6.3.2 Number of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences / workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies year wise during the last five years
	6.3.3 Number of professional development / administrative training programs organized by the institution for teaching and non teaching staff year wise during the last five years
	6.3.4 Number of teachers attending Professional Development Programmes, Orientation / Induction Programmes, Refresher Course, Short term Courses, Faculty Development Programmes etc year wise during the last five years
6.4	Financial Management and Resource Mobilization
	6.4.1 Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly
	6.4.2 Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropers during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III & V ) (INR in Lakhs)
	6.4.3 Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources
6.5	Internal Quality Assurance System
	6.5.1 Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes visible interms of 1. Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality (in case of first cycle) 2. Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality and post accreditation quality initiatives ( second and subsequent cycles)
	6.5.2 The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms
	6.5.3 Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include: 1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC), Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements 2. Collaborative quality intitiatives with other institution(s) 3. Participation in NIRF 4. Any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international agencies (ISO Certification, NBA) Options: A. All of the above B. Any 3 of the above - View Document C. Any 2 of the above D. Any 1 of the above E. None of the above

Criterion 6 - Governance, Leadership and Management

Criterion 6 - Governance, Leadership and Management

Criterion 6 - Governance, Leadership and Management

6.1

Institutional Vision and Leadership

6.2

Strategy Development and Deployment

1. Administration

2. Finance and Accounts

3. Student Admission and Support

4. Examination

6.3

Faculty Empowerment Strategies

6.4

Financial Management and Resource Mobilization

6.5

Internal Quality Assurance System

1. Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality (in case of first cycle)

2. Incremental improvements made for the preceding five years with regard to quality and post accreditation quality initiatives ( second and subsequent cycles)

6.5.3 Quality assurance initiatives of the institution include:

1. Regular meeting of Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC), Feedback collected, analysed and used for improvements

2. Collaborative quality intitiatives with other institution(s)

3. Participation in NIRF

4. Any other quality audit recognized by state, national or international agencies (ISO Certification, NBA)

Options:

A. All of the above

B. Any 3 of the above - View Document

C. Any 2 of the above

D. Any 1 of the above

E. None of the above